After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these kinds of systems. Coming from lie detection tools analyzed at the edge to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of solutions is being utilized in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series www.ascella-llc.com/portals-of-the-board-of-directors-for-advising-migrant-workers/ of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to get around these devices and to follow their right for safeguard.
It also illustrates how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from accessing the stations of coverage. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects just who are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article argues that these technology have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double effect: although they assist with expedite the asylum method, they also produce it difficult just for refugees to navigate these systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.